Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.—In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal. [ch. 7, n4]
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Recent Comments
- PeterM on Die neue Freiheit
- PeterM on On piecemeal reform vs revolution
- PeterM on The right not to tolerate the intolerant
- PeterM on Induction, philosophy’s toughest zombie
- JortM on Induction, philosophy’s toughest zombie
- PeterM on Critical Rationalism for a New Enlightenment
Tags
authority
Bacon
critical rationalism
criticism
deduction
demarcation
democracy
discussion
education
enlightenment
ethics
experiment
explanation
fact
falsifiability
falsification
freedom
freedom of speech
induction
justification
knowledge
learning
liberty
logic
method
morality
objective knowledge
objectivity
open society
opinion
philosophy
politics
Popper
power
problems
progress
rational discussion
rationality
religion
science
scientism
society
theory
truth
World 3
Authors
- .Adams, John (1)
- Journal (1)
- .Adorno, Theodor W. et al. (1)
- .Agassi, Joseph (1)
- .Albert, Hans (28)
- .Albert/Popper (1)
- Briefwechsel (1)
- .Bacon, Francis (3)
- New Organon (3)
- .Banerjee, Abhijit and Esther Duflo (1)
- Poor Economics (1)
- .Benn, Tony (1)
- .Bergson, Henri (1)
- .Blackburn, Simon (1)
- Truth (1)
- .Boghossian, Peter (1)
- .Bronowski, Jacob (8)
- .BVerfG (1)
- “KPD-Verbot” (1)
- .Byrnes, Sholto (1)
- .Churchill, Winston (1)
- .Cockburn, Patrick (1)
- .Colquhoun, David (1)
- .Cox, Brian (4)
- .Dahrendorf, Ralf (5)
- .Darwin, Charles (4)
- .Dawkins, Richard (1)
- .Dawkins/Law (1)
- .Deutsch, David (45)
- .Dewey, John (2)
- .Dryzek, John S. (1)
- .Eidlin, Fred (1)
- .Einstein, Albert (1)
- .Emerson, Ralph Waldo (1)
- .Enserink, Martin (1)
- .Ferrone, Vincenzo (1)
- .Feyerabend, Paul (2)
- Against Method (2)
- .Feyerabend/Albert (2)
- Briefwechsel (2)
- .Feynman, Richard (5)
- .Fisher, R.A. (4)
- .Fuller, Steve (10)
- Kuhn vs. Popper (10)
- .Gadenne, Volker (1)
- .Gladwell, Malcolm (1)
- .Goldacre, Ben (2)
- Bad Science (2)
- .Goodin, Robert (4)
- .Gould, Stephen Jay (6)
- .Grayling, A.C. (6)
- .Harris, Sam (3)
- .Hitchens, Christopher (1)
- .Horkheimer, Max and Theodor W. Adorno (4)
- .Hume, David (3)
- .Jarvie, Ian (17)
- .Jörke, Dirk (1)
- .Kant, Immanuel (1)
- .Kiesewetter, Hubert (2)
- .Kohl, Helmut (1)
- .Krugman, Paul (1)
- .Kuhn, Thomas (1)
- .Lakatos, Imre (1)
- .Laudan, Larry (1)
- .Lipton, Peter (1)
- .Livio, Mario (1)
- .Lockhart, Paul (2)
- .Magee, Bryan (5)
- .Medawar, Peter (3)
- .Meehl, Paul E. (5)
- .Mill, John Stuart (35)
- On Liberty and Utilitarianism (35)
- “On Liberty” (32)
- “Utilitarianism” (3)
- On Liberty and Utilitarianism (35)
- .Morgenstern/Zimmer (1)
- Karl Popper (1)
- .Mosley, Michael and John Lynch (2)
- .Nagel, Thomas (1)
- .Newton, Roger G. (3)
- .Notturno, Mark (20)
- .Paine, Thomas (1)
- .Pies, Ingo (1)
- .Pinker, Steven (1)
- .Popper, Karl (157)
- “Replies to my Critics” (1)
- After The Open Society (2)
- All Life is Problem Solving (3)
- Auf der Suche nach einer besseren Welt (8)
- Conjectures and Refutations (21)
- “Back to the Presocratics” (1)
- “Humanism and Reason” (1)
- “Public Opinion and Liberal Principles” (1)
- “Science: Conjectures and Refutations” (4)
- “Sources of Knowledge and Ignorance” (3)
- “The Nature of Philosophical Problems and Their Roots in Science” (1)
- “Truth, Rationality, and the Growth of Scientific Knowledge” (3)
- “Utopia and Violence” (3)
- “What is Dialectic?” (1)
- Objective Knowledge (18)
- Realism and the Aim of Science (4)
- The Logic of Scientific Discovery (36)
- The Myth of the Framework (19)
- The Open Society and Its Enemies (37)
- The Poverty of Historicism (2)
- Unended Quest (6)
- .Popper, Karl and John C. Eccles (11)
- .Porter, Roy (2)
- .Russell, Bertrand (2)
- .Sagan, Carl (11)
- .Schank, Roger (1)
- .Shearmur, Jeremy (2)
- .Shirky, Clay (1)
- .Singer, Peter (1)
- .Sloman/Fernbach (1)
- .Smolin, Lee (1)
- .Soros, George (1)
- Open Society (1)
- .Stelter, Brian (1)
- .The Julian Assange Show (1)
- .Trotsky, Leon (1)
- .Vollmer, Gerhard (1)
- .Waschkuhn, Arno (2)
- .Weil, Simone (3)
- .Wilson, Edward O. (1)
- Consilience (1)
- .Zimmer, Mirjam (1)
1 comment
PeterM says:
22 December 2017 at 03:24 (UTC 2)
Kiesewetter: „Diese Formulierung ist so klar und eindeutig, dass man eigentlich annehmen müsste, jeder Demokrat oder jede demoraktische Staatsführung würde diese Einsicht nach den Erfahrungen mit Nationalsozialismus und Kommunismus zum politischen Programm erheben.“ („Poppers Offene Gesellschaft und Demokratie“, S. 254)