It is the fashion of the present time to disparage negative logic—that which points out weaknesses in theory or errors in practice, without establishing positive truths. Such negative criticism would indeed be poor enough as an ultimate result; but as a means to attaining any positive knowledge or conviction worthy the name, it cannot be valued too highly; and until people are again systematically trained to it, there will be few great thinkers, and a low general average of intellect, in any but the mathematical and physical departments of speculation. On any other subject no one’s opinions deserve the name of knowledge, except so far as he has either had forced upon him by others, or gone through of himself, the same mental process which would have been required of him in carrying on an active controversy with opponents. That, therefore, which when absent, it is so indispensable, but so difficult, to create, how worse than absurd is it to forego, when spontaneously offering itself! If there are any persons who contest a received opinion, or who will do so if law or opinion will let them, let us thank them for it, open our minds to listen to them, and rejoice that there is some one to do for us what we otherwise ought, if we have any regard for either the certainty or the vitality of our convictions, to do with much greater labour for ourselves. [ch. II, 57-8]
The mental process of critical rationalism
- By PeterM in .Mill, John Stuart, “On Liberty”
-
1 December 2014
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Recent Comments
- PeterM on Scientific methodology (German edition)
- PeterM on The logic of scientific methodology
- Fakten? Welche Fakten? – Wissenschaftskommunikation.de on The power of logic
- Fakten? Welche Fakten? – Wissenschaftskommunikation.de on The mental process of critical rationalism
- Fakten? Welche Fakten? – Wissenschaftskommunikation.de on The role of explanation in science
- PeterM on Die neue Freiheit
Tags
authority
critical rationalism
criticism
demarcation
democracy
discussion
education
enlightenment
experiment
explanation
fact
falsifiability
falsification
freedom
freedom of speech
hypothesis testing
induction
justification
knowledge
Kuhn
learning
liberty
logic
method
morality
objective knowledge
objectivity
open society
opinion
philosophy
politics
Popper
power
problems
progress
rational discussion
rationality
religion
science
scientism
society
statistics
theory
truth
World 3
Authors
- .Adams, John (1)
- Journal (1)
- .Adorno, Theodor W. et al. (1)
- .Agassi, Joseph (1)
- .Albert, Hans (28)
- .Albert/Popper (1)
- Briefwechsel (1)
- .Andersson, Gunnar (3)
- .Bacon, Francis (3)
- New Organon (3)
- .Banerjee, Abhijit and Esther Duflo (1)
- Poor Economics (1)
- .Benn, Tony (1)
- .Bergson, Henri (1)
- .Blackburn, Simon (1)
- Truth (1)
- .Boghossian, Peter (1)
- .Bronowski, Jacob (8)
- .BVerfG (1)
- “KPD-Verbot” (1)
- .Byrnes, Sholto (1)
- .Churchill, Winston (1)
- .Cockburn, Patrick (1)
- .Colquhoun, David (1)
- .Cox, Brian (4)
- .Dahrendorf, Ralf (5)
- .Darwin, Charles (4)
- .Dawkins, Richard (1)
- .Dawkins/Law (1)
- .Deutsch, David (45)
- .Dewey, John (2)
- .Dryzek, John S. (1)
- .Eidlin, Fred (1)
- .Einstein, Albert (1)
- .Emerson, Ralph Waldo (1)
- .Enserink, Martin (1)
- .Ferrone, Vincenzo (1)
- .Feyerabend, Paul (2)
- Against Method (2)
- .Feyerabend/Albert (2)
- Briefwechsel (2)
- .Feynman, Richard (5)
- .Fisher, R.A. (7)
- .Fuller, Steve (10)
- Kuhn vs. Popper (10)
- .Gadenne, Volker (1)
- .Gladwell, Malcolm (1)
- .Goldacre, Ben (2)
- Bad Science (2)
- .Goodin, Robert (4)
- .Gould, Stephen Jay (6)
- .Grayling, A.C. (6)
- .Harris, Sam (3)
- .Hitchens, Christopher (1)
- .Horkheimer, Max and Theodor W. Adorno (4)
- .Hume, David (3)
- .Jarvie, Ian (17)
- .Jörke, Dirk (1)
- .Kant, Immanuel (1)
- .Kiesewetter, Hubert (2)
- .Kohl, Helmut (1)
- .Krugman, Paul (1)
- .Kuhn, Thomas (1)
- .Lakatos, Imre (1)
- .Laudan, Larry (1)
- .Lipton, Peter (1)
- .Livio, Mario (1)
- .Lockhart, Paul (2)
- .Magee, Bryan (5)
- .Medawar, Peter (4)
- .Meehl, Paul E. (5)
- .Mill, John Stuart (35)
- On Liberty and Utilitarianism (35)
- “On Liberty” (32)
- “Utilitarianism” (3)
- On Liberty and Utilitarianism (35)
- .Morgenstern/Zimmer (1)
- Karl Popper (1)
- .Mosley, Michael and John Lynch (2)
- .Nagel, Thomas (1)
- .Newton, Roger G. (3)
- .Notturno, Mark (20)
- .Paine, Thomas (1)
- .Papineau, David (1)
- .Pies, Ingo (1)
- .Pinker, Steven (1)
- .Popper, Karl (162)
- “Replies to my Critics” (2)
- After The Open Society (2)
- All Life is Problem Solving (3)
- Auf der Suche nach einer besseren Welt (8)
- Conjectures and Refutations (23)
- “Back to the Presocratics” (1)
- “Humanism and Reason” (1)
- “Public Opinion and Liberal Principles” (1)
- “Science: Conjectures and Refutations” (5)
- “Sources of Knowledge and Ignorance” (4)
- “The Nature of Philosophical Problems and Their Roots in Science” (1)
- “Truth, Rationality, and the Growth of Scientific Knowledge” (4)
- “Utopia and Violence” (3)
- “What is Dialectic?” (1)
- Logik der Forschung (1)
- Objective Knowledge (19)
- Realism and the Aim of Science (4)
- The Logic of Scientific Discovery (36)
- The Myth of the Framework (19)
- The Open Society and Its Enemies (37)
- The Poverty of Historicism (2)
- Unended Quest (6)
- .Popper, Karl and John C. Eccles (11)
- .Porter, Roy (2)
- .Russell, Bertrand (2)
- .Sagan, Carl (11)
- .Schank, Roger (1)
- .Schilpp, Paul Arthur (ed.) (1)
- .Shearmur, Jeremy (2)
- .Shirky, Clay (1)
- .Singer, Peter (1)
- .Sloman/Fernbach (1)
- .Smolin, Lee (1)
- .Soros, George (1)
- Open Society (1)
- .Stelter, Brian (1)
- .The Julian Assange Show (1)
- .Trotsky, Leon (1)
- .Vollmer, Gerhard (1)
- .Waschkuhn, Arno (2)
- .Weil, Simone (3)
- .Wilson, Edward O. (1)
- Consilience (1)
- .Zimmer, Mirjam (1)
1 ping
[…] Und an manchen Stellen müssen wir dem Publikum auch sagen: Meinungsfreiheit bedeutet zwar, dass niemandem Nachteile erwachsen dürfen, nur weil er diese oder jene Meinung hat. Aber eine aufgeklärte Gesellschaft hat eben auch ein Interesse daran, dass öffentlich kundgetane Meinungen nach Möglichkeit genau dem kritischen Prozess entspringen, dem wir all unser Wissen verdanken. Für eine Erinnerung daran, dass zum Beispiel zwei verschiedene Aspekte einer Meinung sich widersprechen und man sie konsequenterweise also verbessern müsste, sollten wir alle sogar dankbar sein. […]